[Ferro List] Fiberglass mesh for LFC subterranean home: Strength & EMF
Keith B
ferroist at comcast.net
Thu Jan 24 13:42:34 MST 2008
Chuck
Glass fiber is not a preferred reinforcement for FC, for reasons other
than cost and chemical attack. Most importantly, its tensile behavior
is purely elastic, resulting in sudden, brittle fracture when it fails.
Steel reaches a yield point, then stretches some plastically, giving
warning and a substantial reserve of energy absorption during failure.
(Sudden steel structural failure does occur, but almost always when
bolts, rivets or welds break. FC doesn't have critical weak spots like
that.) Unlike steel, you can't bend glass to shape and have it stay that
way, a major convenience in construction. Well designed structures have
working stresses a long way below expected failure levels, but fatigue
is a problem at any level for pretty much any material other than
steel. That doesn't fatigue if the loads are below a critical value.
Perhaps more to the point, if you are building a barrel vault, tensile
strength is likely to be a minor or non-issue. You can do perfectly
well with unmortared bricks or blocks of stone. Within limits, arches
are only loaded in compression, so no tensile strength is needed.
Granted, a drystone arch is a bit leaky, needs to be fairly thick to be
stable, stability does become a concern with exotic curves, and they
aren't the easiest things to build even if stable when finished.
There's certainly good reason to build a concrete arch instead, and more
to distribute any steel reinforcement used following FC principles
rather than conventional rebar. Consider though a double layer of 6"
WWM (welded wire mesh) offset to give 3" holes, rather than anything
exotic. If you worry about EMF, bond it together and across the floor
and you'll live in a Faraday Cage.
Look closely at just using PVA fibers with no steel. Another option is
a ribbed arch, perhaps a hybrid with a single rebar in each rib and an
FC web. Various schemes have been looked at and may be found in the
archives. Slip forming is a bit much for a "one off", but a simple full
arch form repeatedly moved lets all work be done from the top and by
pouring. Spray layup onto an inflated form suits such a simple shape,
and the archives have a lot of neat stuff on making custom inflatables.
One could go on and on, but perhaps the best advice, since you have time
to learn and think, is to tell us where you are, what your site
parameters are (or what you are/will be looking for) and what your
climate will be like. Are you looking to be heavily solar, just
efficient, or planning to go full PAHS? The better we understand your
interests, the easier it is to select from almost infinite options.
kb
More information about the List
mailing list