[Ferro List] subterranean - catenary strongest shape & tensile vs compressive forces
Keith B
ferroist at comcast.net
Thu Apr 3 08:21:34 MDT 2008
Chuck,
The Catenary Arch/Curve is interesting, but of limited use and subject
to some misconceptions. It's what you get if a long member with tensile
but no bending strength is restrained at its ends and allowed to sag
under gravity to its naturally stable position. String or cable can
closely approximate it, but conceptually, it's best to think of a length
of chain, since it's clearer that neither compressive nor bending
strength can be involved.
As tension is increased, the curve flattens. Decrease in tension
produces a deeper sag, but it's important to note that the force vector
at the ends can NEVER become parallel with that of gravity. There is
always some inwards component. It follows that, for the
reverse/inverted case of the Catenary Arch, the compressive force vector
at the foot ALWAYS has some outward component. Whether that can be
dealt with by an angled block and a simple foundation or needs a tension
ring or beam depends on the design. For comparable height and width,
the difference in that respect between Catenary and circular or
spherical is minor to negligible.
More important is the possible misconception that the Catenary Arch is
per se intrinsically self stable. That's only true in one rarely met
case. By definition, that's where the member is freestanding with no
other forces acting but gravity on the element alone and resisted solely
by the element's compressive strength. (Like the chain, it's fine for
the arch to be made of discontinuous parts, so the element as a whole
has zero tensile strength but has the compressive strength of the parts.)
It's fine if you want to live under that, but if you want to also
support lateral thrust from being partially or fully buried, or if you
wish to vertically load it with weights not in proportion to the
projected mass distribution in the arch itself, or, for that matter, to
support floors, resist wind or seismic forces, then the Catenary is
probably not the optimal curve and what you use MUST meet the general
stability requirements for arches. The last requires contribution from
section thickness and may rule out a thin FC skin, for that reason.
kb
More information about the List
mailing list